Senator Doug Jones Testifies to the International Trade Commission on the Negative Impact of Newsprint Tariffs

US Senator Doug Jones

Washington, D.C. — U.S. Senator Doug Jones yesterday testified at a hearing held by the United States International Trade Commission (USITC) on the negative impacts recently imposed newsprint tariffs have had on Alabama’s newspapers. Senator Jones has consistently advocated to put a stop to these tariffs, which are already hurting newspapers, particularly those that serve smaller or more rural communities and are less able to absorb the additional financial burden.

In April, Senator Jones wrote a letter to U.S. Department of Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross calling for an end to these harmful tariffs, and he has cosponsored bipartisan legislation to suspend the tariffs while the Commerce Department examines the impacts of the tariffs on the printing and publishing industry.

A full transcript of the Senator’s remarks to the USITC is below and a video is available here.

Senator Jones Testimony

USITC Hearing: Uncoated Groundwood Paper from Canada

July 17, 2018

Good afternoon, and thank you for providing the opportunity to testify today on this important issue.

This issue first came to my attention back in March, when Bo Bolton, publisher of the Monroe Journal in Monroeville, Alabama—home of Harper Lee—traveled all the way to Washington D.C. to meet with me and my team.

Bo’s message was urgent and clear: newly implemented tariffs by the Department of Commerce threatened the livelihood of his small-town newspaper, and thousands of other small, community papers that serve as the lifeblood of their communities throughout this country.

Since that meeting, I have had a regular stream of publishers visit with me sharing the exact same message, asking for any relief possible before they would have to start cutting their services and laying off what few staff they might have.

What was really even more appalling to me was how we came to be in this position in the first place.

The sources for domestically produced newsprint are quite scarce, requiring newspapers around the country to purchase their newsprint from Canadian suppliers. In other words, the domestic jobs that would be protected by these tariffs is relatively minuscule compared to the number of jobs in the United States that these tariffs threaten. But one domestic producer, NORPAC, which is owned by a New York hedge fund, filed a complaint with the Department of Commerce alleging Canadian newspaper suppliers were being subsidized by their government and thus able to sell below market value.

As I understand is common practice, the Commerce Department levied preliminary tariffs of 6.53 percent in January. That jumped to an average of 22 percent in March when the Canadian producer was found to be [selling] below the market price.

Here’s what I just don’t understand: why would this Administration levy these outrageous tariffs when our own newspaper publishers, logging industry, and paper suppliers do not support the decision?

It seems to me that the only thing being protected by this tariff is a small portion of a Wall Street hedge fund’s portfolio. It certainly isn’t protecting the 600,000 printing and publishing jobs across the country, including jobs at every newspaper in the state of Alabama.

You don’t just have to take my word for it. I’ve heard directly from newspapers across my state about how they are hurting.

The Decatur Daily is facing an increase of $450,000 over their 2017 costs, and they’ve eliminated 11 full-time positions already. Aside from payroll, newsprint is their single largest expense. You’ll hear that refrain from many small papers.

Samuel Martin, publisher of the Birmingham Times in Birmingham, Alabama, wrote to me saying that they are, “hanging on by our fingertips already to survive and things like these tariffs will be the difference on surviving for so many.”

Russell Quattlebaum from the [Southeast] Sun went a step further, writing, “Metro newspapers are struggling and have been before the tariff. This may be the nail in their coffin!”

The alarm bells that are being rung by these small businesses are a chorus that you just cannot ignore. Please, do not ignore.

This tariff is killing jobs and threating an industry that is vitally important for our communities and it is already struggling.

While some big-named media outlets have found their footing in the digital age, that’s not the case for everyone. For many in small towns in Alabama and across the country, folks still like to get their news from actual newspapers. They still like to read a paper front to back. Hold it in hand. They cut the coupons. They read the local events calendar. They learn about what their local officials are doing or, in some cases, not doing.

Frankly, there are still far too many places where Americans still struggle to get access to broadband. These folks don’t have the option to go online to get their news. The digital model just doesn’t work there, at least not yet.

These small newspapers cover local news that wouldn’t make it into larger regional papers if they were to shut their doors. Local businesses lose perhaps their only outlet in which to reach their customers. The biggest losers in this fight ultimately will be the residents that rely on local newspapers to stay informed.

So when I say that these papers are the lifeblood of communities, it is not an exaggeration. It’s a fact.

That’s why I have been so deeply concerned about this tariff. If it’s not rolled back, it will present and existential threat to local newspapers that are already strapped.

It is why I left duties on Capitol Hill this afternoon to come here today to urge you to reconsider this tariff. Instead, consider the significant impact it has already had on these small American businesses. I hope you take to heart the urgent calls you are hearing today and make the right decision to eliminate these tariffs and to protect this industry and valuable the service that it provides to all of us.

Mr. Chairman and commissioners, thank you very much for allowing me to come in a little bit out of order today. Thank you so much.

Comments are closed.